Romance of Deception in Animated Movies

A new romance blossoms. But alas, it is threatened. Danger and power-hungry villains trashing monuments lurk in the shadows, but the tender new romance’s main foe is something much smaller, much more personal, and, with much more specific stakes.

The man has been lying, the whole time, to the woman.

It’s OK, though, she’s bound to forgive him.

I wanted to look at the sometimes bizarre, potentially weird, probably problematic dynamics of a couple of deception romances that occur in some animated classics. Just for fun. Not to judge anyone for liking them (I like them too), nor to suggest that these romances have produced a problematic blueprint that vulnerable child viewers might use when forging their own relationships. I do think media representations matter, but I also think that interrogating media you engage with and enjoy is the best way to make sure you don’t replicate its problematic elements. Also I doubt anyone is really trying to emulate someone like Dimitri IRL, but then, who knows.

Speaking of which…

Anastasia and Dimitri

Let’s set aside the objective fact that this movie really shouldn’t exist and that even the way it does exist, with blatant reimagining of real historical events, it’s eyebrow-raising at best. The characters are likeable. Some of the songs are good. The outfits rock. We can set the real history of it aside for 90 minutes.

What I can’t set aside is my befuddlement at the love story. I remember quite enjoying it when I was a kid and a teenager. Back then, if a romance wasn’t enemies-to-lovers or didn’t involve belligerent sexual tension, I wasn’t interested. I’m not sure why that held appeal for me, though I am inclined to think it’s because those tropes are kind of juvenile. I’m still down to engage in some slow-burn misrepresentation, miscommunication, misunderstanding, and mind-changing, but the clear dislike and trading of insults that happen between Anastasia and Dimitri when they are new acquaintances no longer does it for me.

That’s not even the issue. If it were, I might say, “Well, I don’t really understand at what point they stop hating each other’s guts. Is it when Anya wears a dress? When he sees her in something not ridiculously oversized he falls in love with the shape of her or whatever? And she reciprocates because she likes dancing with him? That’s kind of weak, but, OK.” And that wouldn’t be worth a blog post.

No… it’s more the fact that Anya overhears her grandmother reaming Dimitri out for being a heartless con man, having held auditions for someone to play Anastasia only to take the grieving but hopeful Dowager’s reward money and run, which is exactly what he was planning on doing. This is his plan literally all the way up until he realizes that Anya is actually Anastasia, not just a good lookalike with convenient and manipulatable amnesia.

At that point, he forgets all about the reward money, because suddenly a future with Anya isn’t possible so it no longer matters. I understand why this changes things for him, but I do wonder what his plan is before he realizes the truth. Does he really think Anya would be fine with their scamming the Dowager, or that she’d never realize what they were doing? I guess it doesn’t matter, because Anya is Anastasia, so we never have to find out.

“Princesses don’t marry kitchen boys,” Dimitri laments. Right, but big-hearted women marry con men who deceive them and any other nearby emotionally vulnerable women for cash? Sounds plausible.

As a random aside, I hear a lot of complaints about Naveen from Princess and the Frog. Personally I like Naveen, but I guess I see where those complaints are coming from. OK not really. Flynn/Eugene from Tangled is pretty much the same person, just minus the royal blood and adding in thievery and one brief anecdote about being a poor orphan, and everyone loves him. My semi-relevant point is, Naveen, who has personal growth, who demonstrates an actual change in heart over a prolonged period of time in his movie, is waaaaaaaaay better than Dimitri here. I do get what Anastasia is going for and it has limited time to truly flesh it out, but I’m struggling to think of one Disney dude who starts out half as bad as Dimitri. Not even Nick Wilde, or Kuzco, for that matter. OK. Maybe Kuzco. But his ENTIRE movie was about making him into a better person. Dimitri gets one line.

Dowager: Why the change of mind?

Dimitri: It was more a change of heart.

He fell in love and is now a good person.

Well gosh golly me. That’s not how that works.

It’s particularly annoying because all Anya wants is to find her family. Now there is that “found family” element to the Dimitri thing, sure, but I’d buy that more if she ran off with Dimitri plus Vlad and… Sophie, I guess. Or if she ran off just her and Pooka, which would be the ideal ending in my opinion. Instead she just gets married, promising to see her grandmother again soon, and it doesn’t feel great from my perspective.

Before the murders, she’s shown making promises with her grandmother to be “together in Paris.” This phrase turns into the only clue she has about her family after she suffers from amnesia. When she learns that she really is Anastasia, she has to contend with the fact that her parents and siblings are dead, not that the movie is all that interested in that. Still, she has finally found what she says she wants in her “I Want” song, “Journey to the Past.” Comrade Phlegmenkoff says she always acts “like the queen of Sheba,” and high society walking, dancing, eating, and giving orders come naturally to her throughout. Are we really supposed to believe this girl doesn’t want the royal life the second she gets it back? “Once Upon a December” displays the luxurious parties that, by the end, she for some reason is no longer interested in. It also shows her enjoying herself with (I think) her sisters, and dancing with her father. Even if she doesn’t care about parties and gowns, she has found the one surviving member of her family and has only just got back the confidence to believe the memories that are now coming back to her, and she leaves her and everything else instantly to elope with the con man who spent most of the time they’ve known each other so far lying to her and manipulating her so that he could scam money off an old lady.

What.

What we see in this song? This is a character AND a movie that deserves a different love story and a different ending.

Megamind and Roxanne

My feelings towards Anastasia might be lukewarm to vaguely/nostalgically fond, but I LOVE Megamind. Does that love I have for it mean that I’m less weirded out by Megamind’s deception of Roxanne? No. But the fact that the movie frames it a little bit differently than Anastasia does… does.

A) There’s a lack of (real) belligerence. This may be enemies-to-lovers, but it’s a pretty unique version of that in that Megamind likes Roxanne from the beginning. Does he know he likes her? Probably not. Self-awareness is definitely not a strength Megamind has. But everyone else knows he likes her, or, at least, the audience does. For Roxanne’s part, she’s shown being not at all afraid of Megamind, even when he has kidnapped her, even when he’s finally succeeded and has taken over the city. She’s irritated, amused, and then sad and angry, but never scared.

“Please talk slower.”

B) He doesn’t set out to deceive her, he’s just stupid and ends up piling on the lies because he has no reason to tell her the truth. Or does he? Roxanne blatantly asks him, “Do you really think that I would ever be with you?” And he says, “No.” (It’s a very good scene). Minion previously tells him, “The bad guy doesn’t get the girl!” a statement Megamind echoes later (“I’m the bad guy. I don’t save the day, I don’t fly off into the sunset, and I don’t get the girl”), not long before he does save the day. To Minion, before his disastrous date, he says, “Maybe I don’t want to be the bad guy anymore!” But instead of doing the right thing and telling Roxanne who he is, he just carries on as he is, pretending to be a Metro Man historian or whatever that dude is supposed to be.

While he doesn’t mean to deceive Roxanne, there’s a point at which he decides to carry on the lie because it’s rewarding for him – specifically because he knows he actually has a chance at romance with Roxanne while he’s not the supervillain.

C) There’s a much more prolonged “crap I screwed up” part in this movie, compared to whatever strife Dimitri goes through. He loses everything except his terrible plan to turn Hal into a hero. He leans all the way into it, and things get even worse. He finally has to seek out Roxanne just to fix his mess. (Though he does bring up their catastrophic “breakup” at this point. Just once. Maybe the thing he says about not getting the girl is a second mention of it. Maybe he is a bit mopey. But allegiance-changing and heartbreak are tough.)

D) Though it’s not explicitly stated, when Roxanne asks Megamind to save her and he does, I think he does it without expectation that she’ll take him back afterwards. My justification for this belief is that he seems surprised when she turns off his hologram/deception device and is happy to see him. It’s minor but it exists.

(1:59)

E) It’s Megamind’s story, whereas in Anastasia it’s not Dimitri’s story. Megamind is a supervillain who slowly turns into a superhero. We expect him to misstep on his way to becoming good, so his follies are easier to forgive than Dimitri’s are as far as I’m concerned.

Aladdin and Jasmine

I had forgotten about this one, as the deception in this romance barely registers, but it’s definitely there, so let’s discuss.

When Aladdin first meets Jasmine, he likes her right away, and she lies by omission by not just telling him she’s the princess. He does find out shortly afterwards. When he next meets her, he’s dressed as a prince and pretends to be a whole other person. She shortly afterwards figures out she’s already met him, at which point he makes the frankly ridiculous choice to continue to lie to her. “I sometimes DRESS as a commoner.”

As the audience, we know that Jasmine doesn’t care about prince pedigrees. She does live under a law that requires her to marry a prince, though. Does this mitigate the lying? Maybe. Might not Jasmine have worked with Aladdin to keep up the façade, if Aladdin had told her the truth? Probably. Also, the Sultan just changes the law in the end so… what was the point?

The movie makes it clear that Aladdin’s deception is a bad thing, but it’s only partially about building a healthy foundation for their budding romance. The rest of it is that Aladdin is determined to continue to use the Genie to continue to deceive everyone into thinking he’s a prince, which means reneging on his promise to free the Genie. “She has to marry a prince.”

Of the three movies I’ve talked about so far, this is the one with the least reaction from the lady. Jasmine is just like, “Woah, didn’t see that coming,” and then she never mentions it again. It sort of makes sense, because, as stated above, she doesn’t care about royal blood. Jafar tells her in his irritating but amazing “Prince Ali Reprise,” so there’s a good chance that the medium is more infuriating to her than the message is. It does really seem that Jasmine doesn’t care that Aladdin lied to her. But. Who could stay mad at that face?

Conclusions

Well.

Deception in romance goes down easier if the main character is the deceiver. In both Aladdin and Megamind’s cases, it’s easier to empathize with their deception as they are the protagonist.

It’s sort of contradictorily better both when the woman doesn’t seem to care at all, and when she’s mad for a longer period of time. Jasmine is barely phased, and Roxanne is mad about it until the final showdown with Hal.

In Megamind and Anastasia, forgiveness is sped along because of the villainous guy trying to ruin everyone’s day. In Aladdin there is also one of those but there seems to be nothing to forgive from Jasmine’s point of view.

But really, the only interesting conclusion I have to draw is this:

“Princesses don’t marry kitchen boys.”

“I’m the bad guy. I don’t save the day, I don’t fly off into the sunset, and I don’t get the girl.”

“I’m a street rat, remember? And there’s a law. She’s got to marry a prince.”

Megamind can choose to become a hero. Neither Dimitri nor Aladdin can do anything about the class structure (but the Sultan can) (awkward but I’m going to say it anyway… so can the Bolsheviks). All three feel that they are something that is unchangeable, but the reality is, all three of them are in stories that are about (or adjacent to historical events that suggested that) people can be more than what society tells them they are. In Anastasia’s case it’s just sort of incidental, but still.

Megamind is clearly the winner here. Believing that since infancy he has been destined to battle Metro Man on the side of “evil,” losing his nemesis and later losing his chance at romantic love compel him to rethink his identity.

Aladdin runs a close second. He’s the “diamond in the rough,” someone who is much more than what he seems. I believe this is about how he uses his third wish to free the Genie because the Cave of Wonders had decided that Genie enslavement isn’t cool anymore, but in any case, people tell Aladdin he’s a worthless street rat and the movie says, “he’s poor and almost homeless but that’s not the same as worthless” which is kind of nice.

And Anastasia has Dimitri start as a kitchen boy, but he’s not really a kitchen boy in the end. Not anymore. But that’s awkward because the teenage girl who was a real live person and who this is loosely based on was murdered in the power struggle, so let’s just end the post.

BEEE YOURSELF.

The Genie

Winter Solstice Reading Roundup (Belated)

It’s Frozen. Of course it’s Frozen.


I have no idea what I read during the fall. I know I didn’t get through that much, though, so, go me.

This is not in order and probably incomplete.

the countess conspiracy courtney milan

The Countess Conspiracy by Courtney Milan

Well, it’s Courtney Milan, so, obviously, I really liked it.

It also has maybe my favourite thing from any Courtney Milan and also any romance I’ve read so far:

“‘I know you, Sebastian,’ she said. ‘You like sex, and for me, it’s a complete disaster.’

He simply raised an eyebrow. ‘Let me tell you more about rakus perfectus,’ he said. ‘The whole point of raking is to make sure that everyone is satisfied and safe. There was one night when the woman I was with changed her mind after she came up to the hotel room I had taken for the evening. We spent the night playing vingt-et-un for pennies.’

‘Is that a euphemism?’

He considered this. ‘Yes. By “pennies,” I meant “half-pennies.” It just flows better when you say “vingt-et-un for pennies.”‘

‘Weren’t you furious with her?’

‘Should I have been?’ He shrugged. ‘I won three shillings.’

….

‘When a woman bursts into tears in the bedroom because she’s realized she doesn’t want to go through with it, you’ll make her very happy when you pull out a pack of cards.'”

[Milan, Courtney. The Countess Conspiracy (The Brothers Sinister Book 3) (p. 222). Courtney Milan. Kindle Edition.]

So yeah. That right there is a romance hero.

I’m still annoyed that the costumes on the covers aren’t historically accurate or that the ladies don’t look the way the heroines are supposed to.

I get why it’s like this, obviously. But the reason is stupid, and I’m still annoyed.

witches-abroad-terry-pratchett-new

Witches Abroad by Terry Pratchett

Sigh. I did like it for the most part. There are several laugh-out-loud moments, but overall, I’m still chasing the feeling I got while readying The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents.

Um…

That’s it?

I think there was at least one more, but I have no idea what it was.

I’ll finish up by talking about what I’m still currently reading.

how to be alone lane moore

How to Be Alone: If You Want To, and Even If You Don’t by Lane Moore

I’m almost done this. I highly recommend it. Moore’s is a story about a neglectful and abusive family, which wasn’t my experience growing up and isn’t my reality now, but this is still so easy for me to relate to, and I suspect it’s probably essential for our times.

now a major motion picture cori mccarthy

Now a Major Motion Picture by Cori McCarthy

I really like this. It’s a good premise with good characters and I’m halfway through and I have no idea how it’s going to end.

the bear and the nightengale katherine arden

The Bear and the Nightingale by Katherin Adren

I was going to give up on this after one chapter. I gave it until chapter two… and then three… and did a 180. Now I think I may also finish the series, if I ever get around to finishing anything ever again.

eleanor oliphant

Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine by Gail Honeyman

Read it last year, and it was my favourite, so I’m re-reading it. Apart from it being my favourite, Lane Moore’s book kept reminding me of it so I had to pick it up again.

dumplin'

Dumplin’ by Julie Murphy

Same as above. I think these two were my favourites from 2017. And while I liked the movie (on Netflix) and have watched it numerous times already, I do prefer the book.

I’m in the middle of some non-fiction as well, but I’ll talk about those later.

And that’s all for this year! Get some cozy winter reading in for me… or get some more cozy winter reading in for me, if you’re already doing that.

Do it more.

Jeez.

Summer Solstice (Belated) Reading Roundup

(Parent Trap is the ultimate movie of summer, according to me. It’s got everything: Lindsay Lohan, Linsday Lohan doing a British accent, Lindsay Lohan doing an imitation of Lindsay Lohan doing a British accent, also it’s actually the best and I don’t think anyone could convince me otherwise)

(I think it’s in Spanish)

I’m late but whatever, let’s do this. Spoiler alert: I liked everything.

Spring Equinox

su wild beauty

Wild Beauty by Anna-Marie McLemore

Well.

I’ve had my complaints about how pretty and poetic McLemore’s prose is when talking about her other two books – because I am boring and have bad taste, maybe. But I really liked this one.

Maybe I was more open to it because of the cover art and the title, but I do think the magical elements in this story are really intriguing, moreso than the magic in the other two.

I liked it.

su the belles

The Belles by Dhonielle Clayton

I liked this too. People in this world have “teacup” animals as pets – like, people are walking around with teacup crocodiles and lions or whatever they want, and I’m worried that there will be more abuse of them in further installments in what is apparently this series. Other than that I’m looking forward to the sequel because it’s very interesting so far.

Not sure if sci-fi or if everyone is actually telling the truth and it’s fantasy or maybe it’s both! Either way, it’s really cool.

su winter tide

Winter Tide by Ruthanna Emrys

This was really good. I didn’t expect to like it very much because it’s Lovecraft and I don’t have time for that. The only Lovecraft I’ve tangled with is that DEFINITELY NOT A PARODY BOOK Awoken by Sara Elinsen.

But I liked it.

su pulchritude

Pulchritude by Ana Mardoll

I liked this too. I was expecting it to be a little more (for lack of a better/existing word) gooshy, like the other Ana Mardoll one I’ve read, but it wasn’t.

It was pretty depressing though, and although the cover insert/blurb/whatever warns the reader not to expect what you’d usually get out of a fairy tale, and although I knew it was going to come to a not very nice end, I was still taken aback by it. But it’s what I wanted, so.

su bad girls throughout history

Bad Girls Throughout History by Ann Shen

This was educational. Each woman has a brief little blurb about her, and I did read a few of them with an eyebrow (or two) raised. One specific example I can remember is while I was reading through the inevitable Tudor England portion and the book gushed about Elizabeth (rightfully) but didn’t feature Mary.

And.

OK.

Maybe I’m just Catholic (lapsed) (is there such a thing as a not-lapsed Catholic?), but Mary Tudor has gotten the shaft throughout history.

She’s super problematic but so was Elizabeth, who participated big time in colonialism, if you’d like one example. Mary should have gotten a nod.

Also Jane Grey deserved one too.

And although I got annoyed at that mainly because I’m a Tudor-era nerd, I couldn’t help but wonder what other details were being skipped, and who else maybe should have been included.

Ultimately I still think this is worthwhile, but it’s very Ladies in History 101, which, I think, it’s trying to be.

And I liked it.

su-islands-of-decolonial-love.jpg

Islands of Decolonial Love by Leanne Simpson

I liked it, it was beautiful.

I had a favourite passage I tweeted:

And there you go.

su the heiress effect

The Heiress Effect by Courtney Milan

[Insert stock explanation of how much I love Courtney Milan’s romance novels here]

su six of crows

Six of Crows by Leigh Bardugo

Yup.

(I do have some concerns about the Nina/Matthias thing but I want to read the sequel, watch the inevitable HBO series/movie/other broadcast series/whatever, force my sister to read it, AND THEN I’ll talk about it.)

All right summer, here we go!

PS: WT ACTUAL F, WORLD POLITICS? W. T. ACTUAL. F.

The Last Five Books I’ve Read

 

Happy September cats and kittens! Can you believe how quickly the summer flew by?

We are “working” on a WIP novel, the details of which we may share at a later date. In the meantime, however: Have a book review. In fact, have five.

XOXO, three

Review copy

Why is it that whenever I (three) review books, I end up just complaining about things that bug me? I am such a bitter reader.

What follows is five “short” (by 0wlmachine standards) book reviews, and a few problems I have with a few things. It’s hard to type when one of your foster cats is licking your hands, but I’ll do my best.

Stay With Me Forever

24612981

So here’s how I ended up with this book:

I was in the mood for a romance, but the last few romances I’d read had been borderline at best when it came to consent. I don’t mind reading explicit content – unless, of course, innuendo is used, in which case I get really upset – but I do mind reading rape. So I went hunting for a historical romance that wouldn’t have rape in it.

First of all, many of the ones I opened up on Kobo actually mentioned rape in the synopsis. What is this.

Many others implied a forceful love interest, an “alpha male” if you will. I got fed up.

So I ditched my historical romance idea and took to Twitter. I follow Farrah Rochon, and she’s always got interesting things to say about women of colour in romance. I thought I’d check her out on Kobo. Lo and behold, when I opened this particular book, it mentioned that the main female character, Paxton, was a “career woman”.

That is how you get me to click “buy”.

So I read the book, and it was quite a palate cleanser. Paxton was a likeable, intelligent, hardworking woman who struggled with her priorities and felt guilty about fitting love into her life, since she had enough going on as it was. Sawyer was a successful guy who wasn’t a rapist. Yay!

I find the idea of women who want to “have it all” endlessly interesting, and I love it when I read a book (or watch a rom com) in which a woman doesn’t get cured of her career ambitions via pregnancy. I mean, don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that pregnancy makes you less – it just isn’t the only way to be fulfilled in life. And certainly, not all of us with uteruses and ovaries are into that kind of thing. In fact, some of us think the idea of 9 months without coffee or wine is not worth anything. Anything.

Anyway, my point was, Paxton doesn’t get cured. She gets to reconcile her high school crush, a very non-career-woman thing to have, with her successful lifestyle. Both Paxton and Sawyer give up some things for each other, like all of us in relationships do, but she doesn’t change lanes completely – and for that, Rochon deserves full credit.

Also – Rochon creates settings, and communities, that feel real. There are other books of hers in the same setting, and I’ll definitely be reading them in the future.

No One Else Can Have You

18052934

This book was one of the strangest reading experiences of my life.

The writing style is erratic, and raw, and interesting. I had a hard time putting this book down once I got into it.

The book is narrated by Kippy, a girl whose best friend was found murdered, and is trying to solve the crime using clues from Ruth’s diary. It’s your basic teen-investigates-better-than-local-cops story, and I’m on board with that.

The narrator was revealed to have some violent tendencies in the past. She also seemed to be completely detached from everyone else’s version of reality. And eventually, as I read, it dawned on me that the narrative voice was totally unhinged.

Was Kippy the murderer?

I took this theory and ran with it. When the narrative voice said something off-colour, I thought, wow – this is smart writing. Look at this sociopath, misinterpreting life and her surroundings. Everyone else in Goodreads reviews says the reveal was obvious, but I was so caught up in my Kippy Did It theory that I didn’t notice who the murderer was until the reveal, and then I felt kind of… deflated.

Why was Kippy so unhinged if she wasn’t the murderer? Did the author not do this on purpose?

Once I realized that this wasn’t done on purpose, everything else seemed to fall into place (as mysteries do). Those uncomfortable comments about mental health that I’d brushed off, on the assumption that we weren’t supposed to trust our narrator – that was actually just bad writing. Sigh.

Anyway, I was disappointed by this, and then I went to Goodreads and discovered that the author had stalked a reviewer and then wrote an article about it as if this was a perfectly acceptable thing to do.

Surreal.

Also, my foster kittens peed on this book so I had to throw it out after.

Best Kept Secrets

25739781

Here’s another romance! Since I was talking about rape-free romance before, I should disclose that this one does have some rape and some consent issues, but it’s not apologetically written, so I didn’t mind (readers sensitive to rape content should probably avoid this one though).

Anyway, that aside, this book was decadent. I enjoyed the ride, between Leila (our likeable female lead), Evan (our likeable male lead), and Paulette (poor Paulette. Everything seemed to happen to her.)

Best Kept Secrets was exactly what it advertised itself to be – a story that wraps you up in scandal and romantic intrigue. While I enjoyed the plot for the entire book, the one thing I have to give Ellis special credit for was the ending. I won’t spoil it, but she seriously outdid herself in ending this book on an intense note. I am always so impressed when authors make big decisions that change everything (like, if Kippy had been a murderer. OK sorry)

Ellis crafted some great characters here, which is of course a necessary step to creating scandal people care about. Their stakes were high and it didn’t seem like the situations they got themselves into were unrealistic – which is a complaint I often make about these types of stories (especially TV dramas).

All in all, here’s another author I’ll revisit in the future!

Wench

6751356

Disclaimer: I am not qualified to talk about slavery and its depiction in fiction, so I’m not going to. This is a book about a slave, and the only complaints I’ve seen have been from tone deaf white people such as myself. I will keep an eye out and update this post if I find anything.

Anyway, one thing I find particularly interesting about this book is that we really have to take what Lizzie says with a grain of salt. Some guy on Goodreads accused Perkins-Valdez,  in his one star review, of “telling, not showing”. Maybe it’s a little mean spirited of me to pick on him, but that critique is laughable to me. Lizzie told the reader what she told herself. She told the reader what she needed to tell herself in order to survive the unthinkable situation she found herself in, simply because she was young and black and female. She comes off as simple and naive sometimes, but shit. Can you blame her? If she acknowledges what her life is, how can she go on? THIS IS SHOWN. Not told. Shown.

Another Goodreads review complains that the book just ended. Lizzie admits to herself, without much to do about it, that she kind of wants to kill her master. Then she just goes with him and the book ends. I mean. I was so excited about this.

I often complain that people  think that the Fault in Our Stars was a good book because it was sad. Maybe I think a book is good just because it has an exciting twist. Whatever. I had fun and I’m glad Perkins-Valdez left it open ended. A bold and unexpected move, and, I suspect, highly calculated.

Down the Halloween River

Down the Halloween River

I received an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review. Here are my thoughts:

This is another great addition to CM Blackwood’s works!

This is a quick read, but very entertaining. CM’s narrative voice is fun, age-appropriate and witty, and the heroes of this story, Branbury and Todd, are just as charming as their names would suggest. Coupled with an interesting setting, entertaining side characters and a grander-scale plot with high stakes, Down the Halloween River would be a great read for any middle grader this fall, although adult readers will enjoy it as well. Happy Halloween!